Mayor Frey signs $1m rental assistance resolution, then expresses budget concern in letter to the City Council

Share article

In a letter sent to the Minneapolis City Council on February 11, 2026, Mayor Jacob Frey announced he has signed Resolution No. 2026R-034, authorizing $1 million in emergency rental assistance. While the Mayor supports the goal of preventing housing displacement, his message serves as a “clear-eyed” warning regarding the City’s precarious financial position.

Key Takeaways from the Mayor’s Letter:

  • Support for Families: The Mayor acknowledged that residents are facing severe financial stress and “uncertainty” due to the ongoing federal deployment of ICE agents under Operation Metro Surge. The resolution aims to provide relief by partnering with Hennepin County to provide housing assistance.

  • Budgetary Alarm: Despite signing the resolution, Frey expressed “serious budgetary concerns.” He criticized the decision to pull the $1 million from the City’s general fund balance rather than a dedicated contingency fund, arguing it leaves the City without a financial safety net.

  • Echoing Council Concerns: The Mayor pointedly quoted Budget Chair Aisha Chughtai, noting that the City “doesn’t have cushions” or “magic money” left. He emphasized that even the authors of the resolution were hesitant to use the general fund as a source.

  • The Cost of “Operation Metro Surge”: Frey highlighted the “enormous costs” the City has involuntarily incurred due to the federal immigration crackdown, which has strained local resources and public safety budgets.

  • Impending Tradeoffs: The letter concludes with a grim outlook for the upcoming budget cycle. Frey warned that continued spending at this rate will force the City into “difficult tradeoffs,” specifically mentioning the likelihood of higher property taxes or deeper cuts to core services.

Download the letter…

About the Author

Aisha Daniels
Aisha Daniels
Aisha Daniels covers local stories for Minneapolis Times.

1 COMMENT

  1. Aisha,
    Thanks for reporting on this here. The only other coverage I saw was in “Racket”, and, as is their “thing”, they devoted their entire piece to insulting Frey – while not actually saying that (A) They’d have preferred he hadn’t signed it; nor (B) That it does NOT raise the potential for budget problems as time goes on. They presented almost exactly the same info… So, “Congratulations!” on having done the most professional report on this. And, yes, I know – “Racket” IS a low bar…!

Become a Minneapolis Times Member

Become a member of the Minneapolis Times community and be in the know for all things Minneapolis.

Related articles

Socrates Has Some Questions for the City Council

Before requiring drivers in driverless cars, Minneapolis council members might explain their reasoning on jobs, safety and consumer...

Sixteen Buildings, One Machine: Minneapolis Needs a New Structure, Not Another Shuffle

Time does not take part in strategic planning. Just because an institution is moving does not mean it...

Minneapolis Housing Costs: Beyond Today’s Numbers

A longer look reveals two distinct histories: a rental premium that disappeared and a home-value gap that narrowed...

Fact Check: Does Minneapolis Have One of the Lowest Crime Rates Among Major Cities?

Minneapolis ranks eighth highest for violent crime and fifth highest for combined violent and property crime in an...