Minneapolis for the Many Slings Mud in Ward 7

Share article

Minneapolis for Many suggests City Council candidate Elizabeth Shaffer is a DINO!

I received a mailer today from Minneapolis for the Many (a far-left PAC that gets most of its funding from out of state), suggesting that the Minneapolis Ward 7 City Council challenger candidate Elizabeth Shaffer is a DINO (Democrat In Name Only), hold on, clutch your pearls, a Republican masquerading as a Democrat in our beautiful blue city!

The political ad notes that out-of-state landlord Brian Fitterer gave half a million dollars to Trump in 2020 (therefore, he is evil) and made a maximum donation to Elizabeth Shaffer for this year’s election (therefore, she must be evil too). Now, the maximum donation for a Minneapolis City Council member is $600. I am not sure how much influence you can buy for less than half a percent of the money Elizabeth Shaffer has raised, but I bet it is not much. Shaffer has stated: “As far as the donor mentioned, unfortunately, I do not have the ability to background check all the people who send in money to my campaign…….or have the desire or time to comb through all Katie’s donations to find all her donors’ backgrounds.”

I was able to confirm that Fitterer did donate to Shaffer; however, the City of Minneapolis campaign finance reports appear to misspell his name as Fritterer:

Fitterer also contributed to Michael Baskins, Lydia Millard, and Jacob Frey this election cycle:

The mailer directs you to an anti-Shaffer website that makes the following claims:

  • Shaffer has raised over $16,000 from Republican donors – there are links to the evidence, but I have no way of knowing if the list of people comprises Republicans or not. But assume that it’s true, the fact that 11% of the money she has raised is from Republicans should not be scandalous. Although Republicans are almost irrelevant in Minneapolis, there are still Republican voters in the city. For example, in 2024, 12% of Minneapolis voters cast their ballots for Trump. If you are a Minneapolis Republican, it is unlikely that you would support a left-leaning candidate like Shaffer’s incumbent opponent, Katie Cashman. Minneapolis is a blue city, but their are many shades of blue – it is not all DSA blue.
  • Shaffer donates to Republicans – there are links to evidence, but the evidence is unclear to me. As best I can tell, it appears to be the same list of donors to Shaffer. There is also a link to a letter to the editor in a community newspaper that claims (without evidence) that Shaffer is a republican donor. In that same newspaper, Shaffer rebutted the writer: “Over the course of my lifetime, I have contributed to one Republican candidate, over ten years ago… who happened to be my brother. No regrets.”
  • Shaffer’s donors are responsible for hundreds of property violations across the city in the last two years alone. A link is provided to a spreadsheet that is primarily the aforementioned Fitterer and James Rubin (another $600 Shaffer donor). Although this is a true statement, it overstates Rubin and Fitterer’s influence on Shaffer, and it misrepresents who the bulk of Shaffer’s donors are (regular citizens of Minneapolis).
  • Shaffer is anti-labor based on the fact that Shaffer is a Minneapolis Park Board Commissioner, and the Park workers went on strike in the summer of 2024. A strike is a complicated matter (I know, my dad was a labor leader with SEIU 26 back in the day), and the strike was ultimately settled. Running the park system in a city with escalating taxes on its citizens is a complicated matter. Previously, Shaffer has stated: “As commissioner, I supported the established union and management negotiation process, which ultimately resulted in a historic agreement with LIUNA 363, providing an average salary increase of $11,000 over two years. I am pro-union and am focused on forging strong relationships with workers AND businesses to ensure a strong local economy and great jobs for Minneapolis.” Shaffer is endorsed by the DFL, the Carpenters Union, SMART (Sheet Metal Workers International Association) Local Union 10, and the Firefighters Union.
  • Shaffer wants to criminalize marijuana based on the fact that, as a Park Board Commissioner, she supported banning the smoking of marijuana in the parks. Note you can’t smoke or vape tobacco in the Parks, nor can you drink alcohol in the Parks2. So it is misleading to suggest she wants to criminalize marijuana. I am pretty sure the majority of Minneapolis citizens don’t want someone smoking weed on the beach next to their family, just like you don’t want them smoking tobacco.
  • There is a lot of focus on Fitterer – I don’t doubt that he is a slimy landlord, but again, how much influence does $600 buy you (less than half a percent of the money Elizabeth Shaffer has raised) in a City Council race? My hunch is not much.
  • As a Park Board Commissioner, she diverted funding away from youth programs, voted against an ADA-accessible Greenway ramp, and prioritized parking over parks. It goes on to say Shaffer’s Park Board (oh, now it’s her Park Board, even though she is just one of nine Commissioners) demanded back pay from park worker Indica Medeira, who went on maternity leave after giving birth to her pre-term son. Let’s take these one at a time:
    • Diverted funding away from youth programs – the evidence cited was a 54-page PDF document of a December 2024 public hearing of the proposed 2025 budget and tax levy for the Park Board – I could not figure out what Minneapolis for Many was accusing here.
    • ADA-accessible Greenway ramp – the link is to a Star Tribune article about the Park Board owning a garden, which Hennepin County wanted to pave with a bike and pedestrian trail to the Midtown Greenway. The story, as I read it, was that this was not an open-and-shut case, and there were several inconsistencies to navigate through.
    • Prioritized parking over parks – the link is to a Star Tribune article about converting the Uptown mall into a park, which would have eliminated parking for the neighboring apartment dwellers. I have lived near the Uptown mall much of my life; it is not a park – it is a boulevard that has supported parking all of my life (66 years).
    • Indica Medeira – It is a sad story. Still, the Park Board (which is a governmental bureaucracy with 630 full-time employees and 1,500 seasonal employees) had a perfectly legal policy at the time that required paid parental leave conditional upon returning to work. After Medeira’s plight came to light, the Park Board changed the policy and rescinded their claim against Medeira.

In summary, the election ad sent to my home was not a lie, but a deception. I don’t appreciate the mud-slinging locally; I get enough of that nationally. Minneapolis for Many’s focusing on one slimy $600 donor doesn’t define Elizabeth Shaffer for me.

1. This is what I love about local politics – you can actually talk to elected officials and candidates!

2. In Minneapolis, it is illegal to drink alcohol in public parks unless it is served at a licensed park eatery, a designated area with a special permit, or a sanctioned public event. This means that casual picnics with your own alcoholic beverages are not allowed.

This article originally appeared in Catchgroove Gets Political

About the Author

James Welby
James Welbyhttps://catchgroove.substack.com/
Jim Welby and his wife have lived within a 10-mile radius of downtown Minneapolis for all of their lives and are current homeowners in Ward 7. He retired from a career in financial services. His passions include listening to music (live and recorded), politics, good food, and drink.  He has a political blog on Substack and a music blog.  He loves Minneapolis and is a daily user of its parks.

12 COMMENTS

  1. All of Minneapolis puts out similar mailers. I watched the League debate between Cashman and Schaffer at the Bakken Museum – I thought both candidates did well, and were respectful to each other. They clearly had differences, but they weren’t making it personal. The PACs seem to. I do think it’s fair to bring up Rubin and Fitterer – who are problematic landlords, who have donated to Frey as well as Schaffer. Rubin has played a huge part in that dystopic propoganda documentary – A Precarious State. I have lived in Minneapolis for the last 40 years, 20 years in North Minneapolis. I go to uptown regularly. It has challenges – having Hennepin Ave blocked off for a lengthy period is horrible for business. But the dystopian hellhole stuff is BS. Let’s assume that Precarious State is accurate in its portrayal of our city. Doesn’t our strong Mayor, Jacob Frey partially responsible?

    • I also saw the Shaffer/Cashman debate (here is my take: https://catchgroove.substack.com/p/minneapolis-ward-7-candidate-forum). I am not sure if we should give candidates a free pass based on what the PACs are saying or not – my gut feel is that they need to take accountability for the PACs – either endorsing what they have said or distancing themselves. I will take silence by the canidates as endorsement of the PACs.

      As for canidates and their donors, Shaffer says she doesn’t background check her donors – but can’t you distance yourself once it is pointed out?

      I have lived near Uptown most of my life and agree that dystopian hellhole stuff is BS – however it is still depressing how much it has declined (here is my lament https://catchgroove.substack.com/p/uptown-lament-minneapolis) – we can love Minnepolis and still be critical of its failiings.

    • I hit ‘post’ too quickly. As for Frey’s accountability for his leadership during the pandemic and Floyd, it did happen under his watch, and that can’t be denied. But I am trying to imagine if Fateh, Hampton, or Davis would have done better (I doubt it). I buy into Frey’s argument about extraordinary times. I feel like he did his best, and that still wasn’t good enough; wallowing in regret is not helpful. I am still willing to give him another chance.

  2. A new Next Door post..

    Welcome to “Ward 7 Lies and Deceptions” %2�� Nextdoor

    https://nextdoor.com/p/pgxCG4-s4CsY?utm_source=share&extras=NzY4MzMyNDM%3D&ne_link_preview_links=&utm_campaign=1759532578216&share_action_id=2195e1d1-73b6-4410-a8f2-48d38a1dec23

    Comment..

    This is an important read, below.

    Cashman should be ashamed of herself for her partipation in this. She is young, but STILL, she may want to consider how this all makes her look, given that at some point she will be looking for other work. This dirty business, the misrepresenting and straight up lying, will now be placed prominently on her resume.

    Minneapolis for the Many Slings Mud In Ward 7 | Minneapolis Times https://minneapolistimes.com/minneapolis-for-the-many-slings-mud-in-ward-7/

  3. Read through these other attacks and they’re nonsensical.

    -Youth funding diversion: looks like this was money allocated for 3 youth programming roles that were never filled, so the money just kept sitting there year after year. Shaffer redirected the money so it could be used to repair the broken paths in Loring Park, making everyone nearby happy. Best part: the money money will be reallocated back to the roles. Shaffer basically found a way to unlock funds that otherwise were going unused, without actually taking away from the original youth programming.
    -ADA ramp: reading through the articles, this was a bike ramp that was going to cut through a 35 year old organic garden in Whittier. Nobody wanted it, including bikers and disabled people. Immigrants fought the plans, and the County/MnDOT tried to strip the garden of federal parkland protections so it could build the bike ramp without interference. The crazy thing is that the County could have built the ramp on its own property 10 feet away but wouldn’t for some theoretical transit line? Seems messed up on the County’s part and the Park Board unanimously rejected the plan. This other article from the Star Tribune gives even more detail: https://www.aol.com/community-garden-dispute-could-land-120000292.html
    -Prioritized parking over parks: this one is confusing. But it does seem like there was a chance to get rid of some car parking on the Mall and add new green space. But the renters didn’t want it, and the homeowners didn’t. Not sure what to think of this one. I see your point that parking there has been a norm forever.
    -Indica Medeira: this one does seem like the park staff messed up, especially with the upcoming change in state law in 2026. But it’s hard to blame the commissioners for a mistake on HR’s part.

  4. Yeah, this is what Minneapolis for the Many does, smear their opponents. They did the same to Scott Graham, Cashman’s previous opponent. A similar PAC did the same to Will Stancil in last year’s election to help Katie Jones in the state legislature race. Cashman needs to be pressed as to whether she’s is going to denounce her PAC for its “mud slinging”. After all, I’m sure she, along with her PAC, defended one of her endorsers, AG Keith Ellison, when the media(mostly conservative) reported earlier this year that he accepted campaign donations from some of the Feeding Our Future criminals soon after he met with them in December of 2021. Of course, he claimed he didn’t know about the donors fraudulent behavior at the time, but city candidates are expected to know the background of all their donors?

Become a Minneapolis Times Member

Become a member of the Minneapolis Times community and be in the know for all things Minneapolis.

Related articles

Politically Homeless: A Vote Is Not a Home

Voting against the other side can keep you loyal long after you stop feeling represented. An election can leave...

The Scariest House on the Block

Politics is serious business. Political theater is another matter. Have an idea we should draw next? Leave it...

Socrates Has Some Questions for the City Council

Before requiring drivers in driverless cars, Minneapolis council members might explain their reasoning on jobs, safety and consumer...

Sixteen Buildings, One Machine: Minneapolis Needs a New Structure, Not Another Shuffle

Time does not take part in strategic planning. Just because an institution is moving does not mean it...