Open Letter to Incoming City Council

Share article

Left: CM Wonsley (tan pants), Center: Council President Payne, Right, CM Chughtai

On January 8, 2024, the current City Council held its first meeting. Frankly, you didn’t get off to a very good start. Your first order of business was the Gaza Resolution, where you presumed to advise Secretary of State Anthony Blinken on how to conduct foreign policy. Your qualifications to speak on foreign policy? None. You had no business considering this matter.  And yet it was your first action in office, what you deemed to be the most important thing that you wanted to do. It was the action that would define your whole term in office.

And it was hugely divisive in our city, a divisiveness we did not need.

This was not a public hearing, so public comments were not in order. But that didn’t matter. Decorum meant nothing to dozens of shouting, sign-waving people supporting the Gaza Resolution. They were loud, rude, and antisemitic. Unsurprisingly, one of the signs was a caricature of a Jewish person, surrounded by dollar signs.

And that is blatant racism. In a public building. In a public meeting.

Council President Payne, you did nothing to stop or even tamp down this conduct. You allowed a pernicious form of racism that has existed for thousands of years happen in front of you. But to be fair, I can’t be too critical of you. I certainly admit to disappointment. When you ran originally, you said you going to be “grounding every one of my decisions and policies … in racial equity.” In your very first test, you failed. But still, you had been council president literally for just minutes. And mobs – make no mistake, this was a mob – are very hard to control. So in judging your leadership at your very first meeting as council president, I’m with Bob Dylan: You could have done better, but I don’t mind; you just sort of just wasted my precious time.

That first meeting foreshadowed the next two years: A lot of noise, self-promotion, not much accomplished of actual benefit to Minneapolis residents – you know, those people who elected you to represent them, all of them.

Now the current council’s run is essentially done. There’s opportunity for a fresh start in just a few weeks, an opportunity for a much better start. 2025 election results were mixed from anyone’s point of view, with the far-left winning handily in their strongholds but practical Democrats taking back some seats. But the voters did make clear their desire to have a council and a mayor dedicated to accomplishing important matters that move the city forward, not to divisiveness and theatricality.

Residents deserve this.  Also your own lives, and that of the Mayor, will be more satisfying when you focus on actually getting things done for Minneapolis residents.

Here are two suggestions that will help.

First, share governance. As I write this, it’s not certain whether one faction or the other on the council will truly be able to produce an unambiguous majority. But even if this can happen, there’s a likelihood of a lot of 7-6 votes and there’s no mandate in that math. So elect a president from one faction, a vice president from the other, and divide up the committee chairs similarly.  This will force collaboration. All 13 council members will have to be attentive to improving the fortunes of the city as a whole.

Sure, there will be disagreements, but with a shared governance model no “side” will be able to force anything on the other. And all 13 of you, and the Mayor, can properly be given the credit or blame for whatever does or does not get done in the next four years because you will stand or fall together.

Second, be more thoughtful your symbolic first initiative that you take up right away in January. In 2024, a racist, divisive vote was not a good choice. Here’s a much better choice: resolve to bring the Minneapolis Third Precinct back to the Minneapolis Third Precinct by July 4, 2026.

An opening on that date would be more than six years after the original building was destroyed, 2,229 days to be exact. Some 2,229 days when those who live in the very large third precinct were served by public safety personnel dispatched from across town. Here’s an interesting comparison. On April 15, 2019, the Notre Dame Cathedral was destroyed by fire. Some $985 million later, Paris reopened the Cathedral on July 12, 2024. That’s five and a quarter years, 1,915 days to be exact. Even if the Third Precinct opens on July 4th, 2026, Minneapolis would have taken almost a year longer to rebuild it than it took Paris to rebuild Notre Dame, one of the largest and most complex projects in the history of the world. Let’s end that embarrassing record and get the Third Precinct served with public safety responses that are nearby.

Maybe you have something better that merits the honor of being the first action item in 2026. Whatever it is, pick something consciously. Pick it in a very public fashion. Agree to it. Get it done. And most importantly, get it done together. This will be a far better start than in 2024.

I’ll be thrilled to congratulate each one of you when 2026 Resolution #1 is accomplished.

David Therkelsen has been a homeowner in Minneapolis for 50 years, and attentive to city and school affairs for all of that time. Professionally, he headed two American Red Cross field units, and at one time was co-chief of staff to the President of American Red Cross in Washington, DC. Later he was executive director of Crisis Connection, a state-wide mental health counseling agency. Dave held faculty appointments at the University of Minnesota School of Journalism and Mass Communication, and recently co-authored a book about the history of transfusion medicine and blood banking.

About the Author

David J. Therkelsen
David J. Therkelsen
David Therkelsen has been a homeowner in Minneapolis for 50 years, and attentive to city and school affairs for all of that time. Professionally, he headed two American Red Cross field units, and at one time was co-chief of staff to the President of American Red Cross in Washington, DC. Later he was executive director of Crisis Connection, a state-wide mental health counseling agency. Dave held faculty appointments at the University of Minnesota School of Journalism and Mass Communication, and recently co-authored a book about the history of transfusion medicine and blood banking.

19 COMMENTS

  1. Brevity is a virtue, David. This whole article boils down to “i didn’t like the gaza resolution, the city council should pass a resolution to bring back the 3rd precinct building.” The rest is fluff.

    Also, city councils and local governments nationwide passed resolutions in the 80s condemning South Africa apartheid. I imagine their knowledge of foreign affairs was equally light but they could recognize right from wrong. By your reasoning, you would have scolded them as well?

  2. Wow! This is a fantastic piece! Unfortunately I feel like it will fall upon deaf ears. The DSA city council members are so dug in in their ideological approach to governance that I doubt they will listen to a word you have said here.

  3. The city council resolution taking a stand against US supported Israeli genocide showed courage and principal – and has been tragically but clearly vindicated by two years of continued US supported genocide. [redacted for incivility]

    • Jordan, can you show me the credentials of any city council member demonstrating their expertise in Middle Eastern affairs? Can you show me a single piece of 2023 campaign literature where a candidate expressed their intention to use their council office for international diplomacy and thus, sought voter permission to do so?
      The horrors of Gaza are unspeakable, as much so as the Oct. 7 attack on Israel (when a cease fire was in effect, incidentally). There is ample cause for moral condemnation of both Hamas and the Netanyahu government. But if a city council in the midwestern part of the US has no mandate or charter to participate in foreign policy, does this suddenly change just because of how horrible the situation is?
      If this is your view, then where is the city council’s resolution regarding the El Fasher region of Sudan? Or the torture, execution, imprisonment and forced labor of political enemies of Kim Jong Un? Or the Kazakhstan violence towards women and children? Shall we give each council member a full-time foreign policy aide to keep track of it all?
      You can surely be outraged about the last 25 months. But no, that does not “vindicate” a city council spending its time and resources totally outside the boundaries of its expertise and its electoral mandate.
      All of us have three members of Congress who legitimately do this work.

      • First I note that you censored part of my comment, so it is not valid for you to debate against my message that you censored. Second, how is it workable that an elected official is only allowed to to address issues that they covered in their campaign materials?! You do not need a PhD in foreign policy to express an informed opinion and to take a stand against genocide.. Meanwhile, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that national officials with unquestionable jurisdiction and expertise in foreign policy support and carry out atrocious actions. City council members are entitled to make a judgment about whether a situation is outrageous enough to weigh in with an opinion. You are of course welcome to ask city council members to take stands on other atrocities occurring elsewhere. However the difference with all of your examples is that the our US government is a participant in Israeli genocide and not the other areas you mention. Your whataboutism and narrow reasoning is clearly an excuse to absolve yourself and your elected representatives of any moral responsibility for our government’s atrocities. Your analysis is also [redacted for incivility]. The horrors did not begin on Oct. 7, 2023 but have been happenings for 77 years since Israel formally occupied most of Palestine and expelled a majority of Palestinians. Gaza is filled with refugees from 77 years of occupation and ethnic cleansing, and has bene occupied by Israel sine 1967. The propaganda that Gaza was somehow free before October 7 is absurd and most recently refuted by the International Court of Justice opinion in July 2024.

        • Jordan: “First I note that you censored part of my comment”

          1. The only thing redacted was a personal insult of the author. Personal attacks, insults and name calling are not allowed.

          2. There is no shortage of platforms to engage in uncivil discourse. This is not one of them.

          3. Authors and site members do not have the ability to moderate, modify or delete any comments except their own. Only the site admin can moderate comments. The options are:

          a. Redact the offending part of a comment

          b. Delete the entire comment

          c. Delete the comment and ban the user

          4. You did it again “hinged on your ignorance”, which has been redacted.

          We are agnostic as far as the viewpoint of our authors and commenters. Our goal is to foster thoughtful discussions.

          It’s a credit to our readers that to date we’ve only had to resort to banning 1 site member.

        • As Mr. Tinjum points out, I did not delete anything.
          If elected officials want to depart from the clear charter of their office, they need to do so with the knowledge and consent of their constituents. That’s why campaign materials are relevant.
          Nope, you don’t need special credentials to have an opinion and express it. You do need some qualifications when you speak and act for 435,000 people.
          Yes, this conflict has been going on for a very long time. Palestine has been offered statehood numerous times, going back even further than 1948. Palestine, in various forms, has also been an existential threat to Israel since 1948.
          The significance of Oct. 7 is not that Gaza was “free” prior to that date. It is that there was a cease fire in place, broken by Hamas, resulting in the most deadly attack on Israel since its formation. This of course ignited the entire current conflict.
          As I’m confident you will agree, your comments, and mine, hardly begin to scratch the surface of this complicated and ugly history. Thousand-page books have been written. I’ve read some and probably you have too. This is why well-intended city officials should not use their official powers to wade into the conflict, in the name of 435,000 people who gave them no charter to do this.

    • I do think it’s okay for local bodies to take up resolutions that are not related to local issues in some cases. But not in cases like this, where there was not universal agreement among Minneapolis residents on this Gaza resolution. All it did is serve as an ideological, symbolic stoking of more division in the city. Taking up a resolution like this, that leaves one group of supposed constituents cheering and the other feeling defeated, unwelcome and discriminated against is completely not what the Minneapolis city council should be doing.

      • I agree. I don’t expect nor do I want my City Council to take up precious time to weigh in on complex issues they have no mandate to address. I see it as more of an exercise in narcissism than civic engagement.

  4. This is unhelpful [redacted for incivility], rooted in continuing disappointment that despite spending gobs of money the corporate dems cannot significantly change the city’s power structure. In fact, the council and mayor have accomplished much, which is why Minneapolis is regularly listed as one of America’s most livable cities. [redacted for incivility], and watch the city’s continued progress. The Council and Mayor know what has to be done…

    • Ron, you are right about one thing. Minneapolis is one of America’s most livable cities. I can attest to this, having been a homeowner in Minneapolis for 50 years. The current and recent city councils have played no part in this, however. (Well, except as a near-daily biker, they’ve made the city even better for biking, though with plenty of excesses even here.) We are one of the most livable cities because of excellent governance and management from the 1960s through about 2017.
      In fact, the council has not “accomplished much.” Its anti-business posture, and lack of a strategy to overcome the effects of declining commercial property values, has led to a third year of double-digit property tax increases for many residential property owners. It has blocked in every way it can the re-staffing of the police department, and the rebuilding of the Third Precinct. It has worsened, not improved, the ability of low-income families to build wealth through their home value. It has consistently preferred theatrics to substantive work.
      I share your optimism, however, that the city will continue to progress, especially in that the last election showed that the voters are beginning to grasp who DSA is and what they stand for, and are demanding governance focused on addressing Minneapolis’ real issues. Whichever side is able to cobble together a majority in January, it will now be razor thin. So the 13 council members will have to work together to accomplish anything, and if they all do so in good faith, and with diligence, things will turn toward progress once again.

      • No, the city did not stop progressing in 2017; its livability rating has continued each year since. As elsewhere, the pandemic and advent of out-of-office work severely affected downtown, suppressing commercial property values that’s still driving up city-wide property taxes. The “lack of strategy” by our “strong” mayor and downtown business interests, have perpetuated an unwanted status quo. Moreover, the mayor did not articulate a strategy during the campaign. Rather than frustrate rebuilding the police dept., the Council voted significant pay increases the chief requested precisely to promote hiring. Again, your commentary perpetuated petty gripes and offered little constructive criticism.

  5. The antisemitism of the DSA crowd isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. Read Resolution 2 adopted by the Twin Cities DSA last fall: “Make Twin Cities DSA an Anti-Zionist Organization in Principle and Praxis” (link below). It’s ironic that the Democrats’ strongest proponent of DEI is also easily the most bigoted. What they mean is diversity, equity, and inclusion for everyone…who looks like them.

    https://twincitiesdsa.org/twin-cities-dsa-2024-annual-convention-proposals/?ceid=11701231&emci=085b040d-718d-ef11-8474-000d3a98fa6b&emdi=84935b8f-3b8e-ef11-8474-000d3a98fa6b#anti-zionist

  6. Thank you for setting some context, AND setting a target date for the 3rd Precinct to open at the S Mpls Community Safety Center at 2633 Minnehaha Ave.

    The concern for ANY opening, and for the wellbeing of the 26 neighborhoods the 3rd Precinct serves, is that we STILL have CMs, and will after Jan, that vigorously opposed the 3rd Precinct coming back in, anytime soon, anywhere within the 3rd Precinct.

    To witness all of that, only have to WATCH the Wonsley DSA aligned voting block at the Committee of the Whole on 10/31/23 and the regular Council mtg a few days later, on 11/2/23, to get a sense of the lengths that this group would go to try to stop 2633 Minnehaha from happening…at all.

    Two years have gone by since, lost critical time, where public safety has become much more of a concern, specifically for these 26 neighborhoods. Can only hope that, for the wellbeing of this City, that this new City Council… well, enough of them, will appreciate how truly awful, and yes, absolutely embarrassing, this delay has been for all of Mpls.

    https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/programs-initiatives/community-safety-centers/south-mpls-community-safety-center/

Become a Minneapolis Times Member

Become a member of the Minneapolis Times community and be in the know for all things Minneapolis.

Full Circle

Related articles

Full Circle

On her 80th birthday, a Lowry Hill resident since 1974 takes stock: The trees are dying again, the...

White Students Are Not Exempt From the Twin Cities’ Learning Crisis

Discussions surrounding academic achievement in Minnesota often center on racial disparities, yet focusing solely on gaps can obscure...

Meet the ‘independent voters’ who will likely decide which party triumphs in the 2026 midterm elections

In closely fought House and Senate contests, both parties need to make inroads with independent voters, which poses...

Uptown’s Worst Block Gets a Do-Over

The city admits that the 2018 redesign of Hennepin Avenue between Lake Street and 31st Street didn’t work....