Wasteful Spending: GFS Pedestrian Mall Survey Confirms What We Already Knew

Share article

Minneapolis has spent more than $3.5 million planning the future of George Floyd Square, but debates over the site’s design continue. A recent $380,000 study — the second major round of analysis — again showed that most residents oppose converting the area into a full pedestrian mall, with just 23.5% in support and more than 50% opposed.

Despite earlier community engagement that informed a $3 million plan allowing traffic flow with space for permitted events — known as the “flexible-open plan” — a council committee has pushed for reconsidering a pedestrian mall.

At this week’s Climate & Infrastructure Committee meeting, city staff presented the latest findings, prompting renewed disagreements among council members and community leaders. Councilmember Jason Chavez, who initiated the second study, said he does not support “rushing” the mayor’s flexible-open plan but favors a compromise shaped by community input. The Community Visioning Council (CVC) offered such an alternative, blending aspects of both proposals. CVC leaders say more community involvement is needed; others argue the community has already been heard and that the city should move forward.

The full City Council will vote next week between the flexible-open plan — which could begin construction in 2026 — or the pedestrian mall concept, which would push construction to 2028 and require reinstating a pedestrian mall ordinance.

Watch: 38th Street and Chicago Avenue, George Floyd Square: Pedestrian plaza study legislative directive from the December 4, 2025 Climate & Infrastructure Committee Meeting

Watch more coverage:

About the Author

David Tinjum
David Tinjum
David is a Tech Entrepreneur, Political Advisor and Publisher of Minneapolis Times. For nearly two decades, he worked behind the scenes in Minneapolis campaigns, including serving as campaign chair in six successful City Council and mayoral races before moving on to launch Minneapolis Times in 2024.

1 COMMENT

  1. I have never seen a City Council so dedicated to their own performance of civic virtue, and so deeply uninterested in the details of good governance. I don’t think this bunch of thick-witted “socialist” blowhards will be treated kindly in the history books.

Become a Minneapolis Times Member

Become a member of the Minneapolis Times community and be in the know for all things Minneapolis.

Related articles

Politically Homeless: A Vote Is Not a Home

Voting against the other side can keep you loyal long after you stop feeling represented. An election can leave...

The Scariest House on the Block

Politics is serious business. Political theater is another matter. Have an idea we should draw next? Leave it...

Socrates Has Some Questions for the City Council

Before requiring drivers in driverless cars, Minneapolis council members might explain their reasoning on jobs, safety and consumer...

Sixteen Buildings, One Machine: Minneapolis Needs a New Structure, Not Another Shuffle

Time does not take part in strategic planning. Just because an institution is moving does not mean it...